Trans-Sabah Gas Pipeline
For illustration purposes only
Trans-Sabah Gas Pipeline
The Trans-Sabah Gas Pipeline (TSGP) is a RM4.06 billion (US $969.9 million) petrochemical and gas pipeline project that aims to provide a solution to the power shortage problem in Sabah, as well as increase job opportunities in the region and move Sabah higher up the value chain. It is commonly stated by media outlets, think tanks and academics that the TSGP is a BRI-related project, although this is not officially confirmed. The pipeline will be installed from the oil and gas terminal in Kimanis, Sabah to Sandakan and Tawau. The project owner is Suria Strategic Energy Resources Sdn Bhd (SSER), a special purpose vehicle established in 2016 to implement the project. The TSGP is one of two projects managed by SSER and awarded to the China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau (CPPB). The gas pipeline project was terminated in 2018 by the Pakatan Harapan government, but in a written response to parliament in early October 2021, Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul announced that the Perikatan Nasional-led government had decided to revive the project on February 10th, 2021. He also revealed that SSER and the finance ministry had resumed discussions with the China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau (CPPB) and are now finalizing the project’s new terms and conditions.
The project owner of the TSGP is Suria Strategic Energy Resources (SSER), which is wholly owned by Malaysia’s Ministry of Finance. Established in 2016, the company was set up to oversee both the MPP and the TSGP projects. The Ministry of Finance took over the management of SSER in June, 2018, appointing a new chairman and executive committee in the wake of the revelation of the Ministry’s “red files”, which linked the MPP and TSGP projects to the 1MDB-linked scandal, scandals surrounding the MPP and TSGP projects. In January 2019, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) issued summons against SSER for the infringement of BNM conditions, and the company was fined a total of RM18 million ($4.3 million).
China Petroleum Pipeline Engineering Corporation (CPPE), a subsidiary of China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC), led the project’s engineering, procurement, construction, and commissioning (EPCC) of the project. CPPE is a Chinese state-owned enterprise headquartered in Hebei, China, and has built a number of major pipeline projects, including the West-East Gas Pipeline, the TransAsia Gas Pipeline, the Shaanxi-Beijing Gas Pipeline and the Myanmar-China Pipeline.
Advance Payments to its Chinese Contractor
In a 2019 Ministry of Finance press statement, Finance Minister Lim Guan Eng stated that even though SSER had already paid out RM8.3 billion (USD $1.98 billion) to the contractors—representing 88% percent of TSGP’s total project cost—there was no significant development on the ground, with only 11.4% percent of land clearing completed. The request for a site visit to check on the progress of the pipeline was initially denied by the contractors; later, it was discovered that there was no progress on the pipes. Lim criticized the agreement and opined that payments based on a timeline’s progress rather than on work progress was illogical.
Infringement of BNM Conditions
In January, 2019, Bank Negara Malaysia (BNM) issued summons against SSER for the infringement of BNM conditions related to governance of the project. Six charges were issued under the failure to adhere to Section 214 (2) and (5) of the Financial Services Act 2013.
Connections to 1MDB Corruption Scandal
After Pakatan Harapn came into power in 2018, both gas pipeline projects under SSER—along with the ECRL project—were allegedly linked to money-laundering by the Najib administration to pay off 1MDB-related debts through the offering of lucrative contracts. A media statement by the Ministry of Finance in 2018 noted the possibility of 1MDB involvement and identified transparency issues related to corruption and mismanagement, including that the terms and details of these projects were never publicly revealed during Najib’s administration.
Lack of Feasibility Study and Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)
The Democratic Action Party (DAP), one of Malaysia’s political parties, flagged the absence of a feasibility study for the TSGP. The party’s Secretary insisted on a feasibility study for the project and questioned the necessity of a loan with China instead of using private finance initiative options (PFI) or involving Malaysia’s state-owned oil and gas company PETRONAS. Without the publication of an EIA, or the knowledge that a proper assessment was conducted at all, it is difficult to gauge whether the project planners were aware of the TSGP’s feasibility issues and its potential for costly environmental mistakes that would later require modifications and legislative interventions. The TSGP also does not appear to have followed legally required processes for land acquisition from the state government of Sabah.
Transparency Gaps
Major information about the project is not available, including: its total cost, whether a feasibility study and EIA were conducted, whether land acquisition rules were complied with, and the terms of the loan taken out to fund this project.
Project & Contract Phase | Project Information | Score | Response | Link to Information |
---|---|---|---|---|
Project Identification | Project owner | Suria Strategic Energy Resources (SSER) | https://www.mof.gov.my/arkib/press/MR2019/May/Press%20Release_%20Legal%20Status%20Of%20Efforts%20To%20Recover%20Monies%20Paid%20For%20The%20RM9.4%20Billion%20Pipeline%20Projects%20Under%20Suria%20Strategic%20Energy%20Resources%20Sdn%20Bhd%20(SSER).pdf | |
Sector, subsector | Sector: Energy Subsector: Oil and gas |
|||
Project name | Trans-Sabah Gas Pipeline | https://www.mof.gov.my/arkib/press/MR2019/May/Press%20Release_%20Legal%20Status%20Of%20Efforts%20To%20Recover%20Monies%20Paid%20For%20The%20RM9.4%20Billion%20Pipeline%20Projects%20Under%20Suria%20Strategic%20Energy%20Resources%20Sdn%20Bhd%20(SSER).pdf | ||
Project Location | The Trans-Sabah Gas Pipeline (TSGP) project was a proposed 662 km (411-mile) petrochemical and gas pipeline project located in Kimanis, Sabah and encompasses Sandakan and Tawau | https://thediplomat.com/2018/08/malaysias-canceled-belt-and-road-initiative-projects-and-the-implications-for-china/ | ||
Purpose |
The TSGP project was framed as a solution for the power shortage problem in Sabah, and was meant to replace an obsolete power plant located in East Sabah. The projected benefits of the TSGP were expected to add value to the local commodities and raw materials which would result in moving Sabah up the value chain which will expand the state’s sources of revenue thus reducing the state’s dependency on the primary industries. Additionally, the project is also expected to increase job opportunities across the region. |
https://beltandroad.hktdc.com/en/insights/major-bri-gas-pipeline-project-awaits-outcome-malaysian-election | ||
Project description | The Trans-Sabah Gas Pipeline (TSGP) is a MYR 4.06 billion petrochemical and gas pipeline project that aims to provide a solution for the power shortage problem in Sabah, increase job opportunities in the region as well as to move Sabah higher in the value chain. The pipeline will be installed starting from Kimanis, Sabah and stretching out to Sandakan and Tawau. The project will mainly be overseen by Suria Strategic Energy Resources Sdn Bhd and constructed by China Petroleum Pipeline Engineering Corporation (CPPE), a subsidiary of the China National Petroleum Corporation (CNPC). | https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/10/23/controversy-as-sabah-gas-pipeline-project-revived/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_.R7ZX5xg_CGZIAkqOFP993iRO6ZgQdGcb4ciPVPF6Xw-1635245456-0-gqNtZGzNAqWjcnBszQnR | ||
Project Preparation | Project Scope (main output) | Not available | ||
Environmental impact | No blueprint of the contruction online, only an article stating that it would go through the Tropical Rainforest of Sabah. No information on the EIA available | http://www.dailyexpress.com.my/read/2711/issues-concerning-the-trans-sabah-gas-pipeline-project/ | ||
Land and settlement impact | Not available | |||
Contact details | The office is on the 9th floor, Menara 1 Dutamas, Solaris Dutamas, No. 1, Jalan Dutamas 1, Email not found | https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/mof-subsidiary-suria-strategic-fined-rm18m-infringing-bnm-conditions-pipeline-projects | ||
Funding sources | Export and Import Bank of China (EXIM) invested USD 1.16billion which coveres 85% of the financing cost over a 20 year loan facility guaranteed by the governement. SSER applied for revolving credit facility from CIMB Bank worth RM1.2billion, the remaining 15% was to be footed by the government through sukuk issuance. | https://www.mof.gov.my/arkib/press/MR2019/May/Press%20Release_%20Legal%20Status%20Of%20Efforts%20To%20Recover%20Monies%20Paid%20For%20The%20RM9.4%20Billion%20Pipeline%20Projects%20Under%20Suria%20Strategic%20Energy%20Resources%20Sdn%20Bhd%20(SSER).pdf https://www.thesundaily.my/archive/mof-reveals-suspicious-transactions-involving-trans-sabah-gas-pipeline-and-multi-pro-NUARCH552844 |
||
Project Budget | The estimated budget is RM 4.06billion, no information on land, property aquisiiton, enviromental mitigaiton measures, H&S provisions etc. are available | https://www.mof.gov.my/arkib/press/MR2019/May/Press%20Release_%20Legal%20Status%20Of%20Efforts%20To%20Recover%20Monies%20Paid%20For%20The%20RM9.4%20Billion%20Pipeline%20Projects%20Under%20Suria%20Strategic%20Energy%20Resources%20Sdn%20Bhd%20(SSER).pdf | ||
Project budget approval date | The projects received Cabinet approval on July 27, 2016. The terms of the contracts received approval from the Prime Minister at that time, Dato’ Sri Najib Tun Razak | https://themalaysianreserve.com/2018/07/06/mof-orders-immediate-suspension-of-mpp-tsgp-and-ecrl-works/ | ||
Project Completion | Project status (current) | Both the TSGP and the MPP were suspended in 2018 following a change in government, but in a written response to parliament in early October 2021, Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul announced that the new Perikatan Nasional-led government had decided to revive the project on February 10th, 2021. | https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/10/23/controversy-as-sabah-gas-pipeline-project-revived/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_.R7ZX5xg_CGZIAkqOFP993iRO6ZgQdGcb4ciPVPF6Xw-1635245456-0-gqNtZGzNAqWjcnBszQnR | |
Completion cost (projected) | Both the TSGP and the MPP were suspended in 2018 following a change in government, but in a written response to parliament in early October 2021, Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul announced that the new Perikatan Nasional-led government had decided to revive the project on February 10th, 2021. He also revealed that SSER and the finance ministry had resumed discussions with the China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau (CPPB), and are now finalising the project’s new terms and conditions. | https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/10/23/controversy-as-sabah-gas-pipeline-project-revived/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_.R7ZX5xg_CGZIAkqOFP993iRO6ZgQdGcb4ciPVPF6Xw-1635245456-0-gqNtZGzNAqWjcnBszQnR | ||
Completion date (projected) | Both the TSGP and the MPP were suspended in 2018 following a change in government, but in a written response to parliament in early October 2021, Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul announced that the new Perikatan Nasional-led government had decided to revive the project on February 10th, 2021. He also revealed that SSER and the finance ministry had resumed discussions with the China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau (CPPB), and are now finalising the project’s new terms and conditions. | https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/10/23/controversy-as-sabah-gas-pipeline-project-revived/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_.R7ZX5xg_CGZIAkqOFP993iRO6ZgQdGcb4ciPVPF6Xw-1635245456-0-gqNtZGzNAqWjcnBszQnR | ||
Scope at completion | Both the TSGP and the MPP were suspended in 2018 following a change in government, but in a written response to parliament in early October 2021, Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul announced that the new Perikatan Nasional-led government had decided to revive the project on February 10th, 2021. He also revealed that SSER and the finance ministry had resumed discussions with the China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau (CPPB), and are now finalising the project’s new terms and conditions. | https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/10/23/controversy-as-sabah-gas-pipeline-project-revived/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_.R7ZX5xg_CGZIAkqOFP993iRO6ZgQdGcb4ciPVPF6Xw-1635245456-0-gqNtZGzNAqWjcnBszQnR | ||
Reasons for project changes | Both the TSGP and the MPP were suspended in 2018 following a change in government, but in a written response to parliament in early October 2021, Finance Minister Tengku Zafrul announced that the new Perikatan Nasional-led government had decided to revive the project on February 10th, 2021. He also revealed that SSER and the finance ministry had resumed discussions with the China Petroleum Pipeline Bureau (CPPB), and are now finalising the project’s new terms and conditions. | https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/10/23/controversy-as-sabah-gas-pipeline-project-revived/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_.R7ZX5xg_CGZIAkqOFP993iRO6ZgQdGcb4ciPVPF6Xw-1635245456-0-gqNtZGzNAqWjcnBszQnR | ||
Reference to audit and evaluation reports | Not Available | |||
Contract Phase | Procuring entity | Suria Strategic Energy Resource (SSER) and CPPE | https://www.mof.gov.my/arkib/press/MR2019/May/Press%20Release_%20Legal%20Status%20Of%20Efforts%20To%20Recover%20Monies%20Paid%20For%20The%20RM9.4%20Billion%20Pipeline%20Projects%20Under%20Suria%20Strategic%20Energy%20Resources%20Sdn%20Bhd%20(SSER).pdf | |
Procuring entity contact details | 9th floor, Menara 1 Dutamas, Solaris Dutamas, No. 1, Jalan Dutamas 1 | https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/mof-subsidiary-suria-strategic-fined-rm18m-infringing-bnm-conditions-pipeline-projects | ||
Procurement process | Not Available | |||
Contract type | Engineering, Procurement, Construction, and Commissioning (EPCC) contract | https://www.mof.gov.my/portal/arkib/press/MR2019/May/Press%20Release_%20Legal%20Status%20Of%20Efforts%20To%20Recover%20Monies%20Paid%20For%20The%20RM9.4%20Billion%20Pipeline%20Projects%20Under%20Suria%20Strategic%20Energy%20Resources%20Sdn%20Bhd%20(SSER).pdf | ||
Contract status (current) | Closed | https://thediplomat.com/2018/08/malaysias-canceled-belt-and-road-initiative-projects-and-the-implications-for-china/ | ||
Number of firms tendering | Not Available | |||
Cost estimate | The estimated budget is MYR 4.06billion | https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/10/23/controversy-as-sabah-gas-pipeline-project-revived/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_.R7ZX5xg_CGZIAkqOFP993iRO6ZgQdGcb4ciPVPF6Xw-1635245456-0-gqNtZGzNAqWjcnBszQnR | ||
Contract administration entity | Construction: China Petroleum Pipeline Engineering Corporation (CPPE) | https://www.mof.gov.my/portal/arkib/press/MR2019/May/Press%20Release_%20Legal%20Status%20Of%20Efforts%20To%20Recover%20Monies%20Paid%20For%20The%20RM9.4%20Billion%20Pipeline%20Projects%20Under%20Suria%20Strategic%20Energy%20Resources%20Sdn%20Bhd%20(SSER).pdf | ||
Contract title | Not Available | |||
Contract firm(s) | Construction: China Petroleum Pipeline Engineering Corporation (CPPE) | https://www.mof.gov.my/portal/arkib/press/MR2019/May/Press%20Release_%20Legal%20Status%20Of%20Efforts%20To%20Recover%20Monies%20Paid%20For%20The%20RM9.4%20Billion%20Pipeline%20Projects%20Under%20Suria%20Strategic%20Energy%20Resources%20Sdn%20Bhd%20(SSER).pdf | ||
Contract price | RM4.06 billion | https://www.freemalaysiatoday.com/category/nation/2021/10/23/controversy-as-sabah-gas-pipeline-project-revived/?__cf_chl_jschl_tk__=pmd_.R7ZX5xg_CGZIAkqOFP993iRO6ZgQdGcb4ciPVPF6Xw-1635245456-0-gqNtZGzNAqWjcnBszQnR | ||
Contract scope of work | Not available | |||
Contract start date and duration | Awarded to CPPB on 1st Nov 2016, the estimated completion time is 3 years | |||
Implementation | Variation to contract price | Not Available | ||
Escalation of contract price | Not Available | |||
Variation to contract duration | Not Available | |||
Variation to contract scope | Not Available | |||
Reasons for price changes | Not Available | |||
Reasons for scope & duration changes | Not Available |